Friday, June 8, 2018
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Pt. Brijbhushan Kabra (1937-2018) and the Indian Classical Guitar
Until the 1960s, the Hawaiian Slide Guitar had been
heard mainly in film songs, and in the regional music of Bengal. The credit for
elevating the instrument to the Hindustani art music platform goes to Pandit
Brijbhushan Kabra.
With friend and collaborator: Pt. Shivkumar Sharma |
In the basic model, the shell of the instrument is an
F-hole Guitar of European design, acoustically and structurally enhanced to
support a multitude of strings. But, the design of the Indian adaptation is far from
standard yet. There are several variants in circulation, with some of them even
sporting names suggesting the identities of their “creators”.
The Vichitra Veena legacy
The Vichitra Veena receded from the
mainstream almost simultaneously with the Dhrupad/ Dhamar genre of mainstream
music, of which the instrument was once an integral part. The major reason for its
decline would appear to be its cumbersome handling, and an acoustic
quality unsuited for the contemporary environment, governed by the electronic
manipulation of musical output.
The Hawaiian slide-Guitar appeared to solve both these
problems simultaneously while offering the distinctive quality of the slide-Veena
-- the ability to reproduce every nuance of Indian vocalism with minimum
interference from the sound-priming [plucking] activity. Admittedly, the
slide-Guitar was inferior in this role to the Sarangi, a bowed instrument. But,
within the plucked lute family, and as a successor to the Vichitra Veena, it could have no peer as a mimic of the vocal
expression. Because of this advantage, the Hawaiian slide-Guitar offered a much
wider range of stylistic options than the Sitar and Sarod, both of which
required a higher frequency of plucking.
The only trigger the slide-Guitar required
for reviving the Vichitra Veena legacy was towering musicianship, which
could demonstrate its musical potential, especially relative to the dominant plucked lutes -- the Sitar and
Sarod. The instrument found its champion in Brijbhushan Kabra.
Kabra’s Guitar
Brijbhushan, a qualified mining geologist, came from a
business family with a deep involvement in music. His father had studied the
Sitar under the legendary Ustad Enayet Khan, the father of Ustad Vilayat Khan.
Brijbhushan’s elder brother, Damodarlal, was a distinguished Sarod player
trained by Ustad Ali Akbar Khan. In defiance of acute cynicism within the
family, Brijbhushan said “no” to the Sitar as well as the Sarod, and accepted
the challenge of elevating the slide-Guitar to a level of parity with them
under the tutelage of Ustad Ali Akbar Khan.
Inevitably, Kabra went along with the established
musical approach of the major plucked lutes, the Sitar and Sarod. The first
step in this direction was the introduction of chikari [drone] strings. As on
the Sitar and the Sarod, his chikari set is mounted on a post midway up the
stem of the Guitar on the bass [inward] side. His repertoire includes a
three/four tiered alap-jod-jhala movement, slow tempo compositions primarily of
Masitkhani format in Tritala, medium tempo compositions in Rupak [seven beats]
and Jhaptala [ten beats], and fast tempo compositions in Tritala [sixteen
beats] followed by a jhala. As with the Sitar and Sarod, light and
semi-classical compositions in a variety of tala-s [rhythmic cycles] became an
important part of a comprehensive repertoire to satisfy contemporary audiences.
Despite the benefit of guidance from Ustad Ali Akbar Khan, a colossus
amongst instrumentalists, Kabra had to rely on his own resourcefulness for technique.
Kabra’s musical vision is deeply entrenched in vocalism. It might even be said
that, in the melodic content of his music, he has pitted his instrument against
the Sarangi, rather than the Sitar or Sarod. He places the highest premium on
the capabilities of the slide-Guitar for delivering the melodic continuity and
microtonal subtleties of Hindustani vocalism. This logically meant the
development of an idiom and technique that would minimize the frequency of
strokes, and maximize the melodic density achievable under the impact of each
stroke. These became the guiding principles of Kabra’s musical endeavors.
Within the raga presentation format of the plucked
lutes, Kabra’s musical vision, and the instrument’s capabilities, led him to
develop the anarhythmic and melodically rich alap form as his forte. In order
to pack the maximum power into each stroke, Kabra dispensed with the picks
conventionally used by slide-Guitarists, and opted to play with wire plectra
[mizrab-s] used by Sitarists.
Once he had harnessed additional stroke power with
Sitar plectra, he could achieve the desired manipulation of timbre, volume, and
sustain without the addition of sympathetic strings. In an interview with the
present author, Kabra expressed the view that the slide-Guitar is so rich in the
delivery of microtonal values and melodic continuity, that the Sitar/ Sarod model of acoustic design
is irrelevant for the instrument. Kabra also argued that the sympathetic
strings, which support only the discrete swara-s in the raga scale, have the effect
of drowning out microtonal subtleties on the Slide guitar. As a result, the
delivery of melodic value is limited, rather than enhanced, by the sympathetic
strings, which his juniors amongst Guitarists have widely adopted.
In order to minimize the melodic discontinuity in his
music, Kabra reduced the role of multiple-string execution by opting, once
again, for a Sitar-style solution -- of using the first string as the main
melodic string, and tuning the second and third strings also in the Sitar style
. This enabled him to execute melody across two full octaves on the main
string, requiring the second and third strings only for the lower octave. In
his interviews to the American press, he has argued that Hindustani music, with
its vocalist model, does not require a melodic canvas larger than three
octaves.
Kabra’s
music
Kabra’s repertoire is basically mainstream music,
biased in favour of popular raga-s like Puriya Kalyan, Bageshri, Bihag
Madhuwanti, Jaijaiwanti, Hameer and Nat Bhairav. His discography shows a fair
representation of light music – melodies like Kafi, Gara, Rajasthani folk,
Mand, and Piloo. The patent raga-s of the Maihar Senia lineage, such as Gauri
Manjari and the Carnatic raga Kirwani appear to have only a small presence in
his performing material.
With his design of the instrument, and his novel
technique, Kabra has achieved an acoustic richness in the musical output of the
Slide Guitar, which approaches the more mature plucked instruments like the
Sitar and the Sarod. In the presentation of raga-based music, Kabra strongly
favors the alap-jod-jhala forms, often even as stand-alone pieces of music,
without rhythm-accompanied forms following it. Even on a mass medium like the
radio, he is known to have performed a 40-minute alap-jod-jhala as a
self-sufficient rendition. This predilection is consistent with his highly
vocalized melodic imagination, and his belief that these movements are the best
vehicles for the unique melodic capabilities of his instrument. Kabra’s percussion-accompanied
music largely follows the orientations of the Maihar Senia lineage. His
bandishes are composed in vilambit, madhyalaya or drut Tritala, or in
madhyalaya Roopak or Jhaptala.
Kabra has also been an immensely successful duet
musician. His partnership with Shivkaumar Sharma and Hariprasad Chaurasia
produced the “Call of the valley” album, which is now the stuff of legend. His
duets with Shivkumar Sharma – particularly the LP recording of Jhinjhoti – ia
also amongst the most memorable pieces of duets produced in recent history.
Kabra established himself and the slide-Guitar in
Hindustani music at a time when three giants -- Ustad Vilayat Khan, Pandit Ravi
Shankar, and Ustad Ali Akbar Khan – were at the peak of their creative and
technical prowess. In such an environment, the mere novelty of the slide-Guitar
could not have assured the instrument a future in Hindustani music. Kabra’s
success can be explained only as a victory of his perception, and exploitation, of the
distinctive musical value that the Hawaiian slide-Guitar had to offer.
After Kabra
In response to the changes in the environment of
Hindustani music, Kabra’s successors on the slide-Guitar scene, including his
own disciples, have drifted away from the technical and stylistic choices he
made. Most of them have chosen a stylistic direction with a much higher stroke
density than Kabra’s, and an extensive use of multiple-string execution as an
important element in their music. The slide-Guitar idiom is now drifting closer
to the idiom of the Sarod, but surpassing it in dazzling potential, thanks to
the slide-Guitar’s superior ergonomics. The technical decisions of the younger
Guitarists reflect these directions.
A melodic canvas spanning four octaves, and across
five strings, is now in favour. Sympathetic
strings have now become a stable feature of the Indian classical Guitar. The
emphasis is now on kaleidoscopic tonal patterning and dazzling virtuosity,
rather than elaborate raga presentation and melodic richness. Strokes therefore
need ergonomic facility more than depth or power. To this end, Guitar-style
picks have replaced Kabra’s mizrab. Some Guitarists have also found it
efficient to shift the chikari drones to the treble [outward] side of the
instrument.
Whether as an acoustic machine, or as the presenter of
a well-defined style of instrumental music, the Indian classical Guitar is
still in a state of evolution. While the succeeding generations of Hindustani
Slide Guitar maestros have successfully sent the instrument into international
orbit, Kabra's pioneering and formidable musicianship remains a landmark in the history of Hindustani instrumental music. .
(c) Deepak Raja. April 2005
Thursday, March 22, 2018
Shaping a life in classical music
Paper presented to the Seminar on Pedagogy of Performing Arts, hosted by the Lalit Kala Kendra, Gurukul, Savitribai Phule Pune University, on March 6-7, 2018.
This seminar is focused on the pedagogy concerns of the University system. The system represents a massive commitment of public funds. Those concerned about the social value of this commitment are best equipped to evolve the processes suited to its objectives. I have neither studied Hindustani music in the University environment, nor taught in it. I can therefore contribute only tangentially to the theme of today’s seminar.
Whatever I say is based on 60 years of research on a perfect sample of one – myself – and my interactions with some of the leading musicians of our times. As I see it, we are talking, essentially, about shaping lives in classical music. And, this will be the focus of my observations.
I have a mildly eccentric view on the serious engagement of individuals with classical music. Most of us in this room consider ourselves “trained musicians” or “trained musicologists”. We also gladly admit that we are whatever we are because of our Guru-s/ teachers. In my view, this is a culturally conditioned notion, not entirely supported by the reality. I state this as an academic observation. And, I say this with the benefit of studying with some of the finest Guru-s, and without the slightest disrespect to their contribution to my evolution. But, if I, or my Guru-s, try putting our fingers on what precisely was taught, when, and how, we are likely to come up with amusing answers which carry no conviction.
Thousands of people go through degrees in music or personalized taleem, but never emerge as either musicians or musicologists. It is also possible to prove that many who have devoted their lives to the pursuit of classical music in either pursuit, and even excelled, had no degrees or taleem. So, whether we are talking of the personalized system of art transmission, or of institutionalized teaching, or something entirely different, the key to excellence in classical music lies within the aspirant, far more than in the environment which may claim to shape his/ her potential. In addition to their natural endowments of musicality, musicians and musicologists of any significance are born with an obsession with the mysteries of patterned sound, and pursue that obsession irrespective of economic and other consequences.
Allied to this is my view that a life in classical music may flower as a commitment to either performance or scholarship. From my own experience, I can say that when I was only pursuing performance, I was also acquiring a great wealth of musical thought. And, when I began to pursue musicology, the quality of my performance improved steadily and perceptibly. From this, I infer that the same person may pursue different routes simultaneously or at different stages in his life. The two are, indeed, distinct professions, because they are accountable to different audiences and constituencies. But, this does not make theory and performance distinct pedagogical issues – except at an advanced level and except in the department of communication skills. A life in music is a life in music.
This is so because our music is a process, and not a product. It has no existence independently of performance. Without a deep involvement with the process, you qualify neither for musicianship, nor for scholarship. Society changes. The aesthetic assumptions underlying performance change. The music changes. Theory gets re-written. But, musical thought and performance remain perennially connected.
Having laid out my perspective on a life in music, I shall proceed more systematically to look at the shaping of musicianship, which I possibly understand better than scholarship. I shall deal with the following dimensions of musicianship, and consider what each one might signify as a pedagogical issue.
1. The basic equipment of musicianship
2. The communicative dimension of musicianship
3. The expressive dimension of musicianship
4. The meditative dimension of musicianship
The basic equipment
An individual qualifies for a serious involvement in music by having an above-average endowment of two faculties:
(1) Pitch differentiation: the ability to distinguish sounds as being either higher or lower than others.
(2) Pattern recognition: The ability to identify sound patterns.
Pitch differentiation is, I suspect, largely a genetically ingrained faculty. An above-average score on this dimension is required for intense involvement with all categories of music. Classical music certainly demands more refined pitch differentiation abilities than other categories of music. I am not aware if research in neuro-acoustics now enables aspirants to improve their scores on this count. My suspicion, however, is that the possibilities for such enhancement would be limited.
Pattern recognition is an entirely different ability of the mind. The word “recognition” provides the clue to its character. We recognize patterns only by relating them to familiar patterns stored in the mind. Some basic patterns may be genetically embedded at birth – I don’t know what science has to say about this. But, beyond this, our entire bank of stored patterns is acquired either involuntarily from the environment or by the purposive cultivation of the mind.
Classical music demands a more sophisticated ability of pattern-recognition than other categories of music. A person’s ability to perceive, store, and recall patterns is largely a function of the intelligence and memory. These, too, are grey areas in psychology. There is, to my knowledge, no consensus on the degree to which these are genetically ingrained, or acquired, or to what extent these can be enhanced.
Of immediate concern to us are Raga and Tala patterns. This sounds easy, and manageable. What is “easily” taught, however, is limited by the limitations of the teachers and aspirants. The great musician is known for having explored a canvas of patterns far beyond what can be taught by one Guru or even multiple Gurus or at a University. The idea of patterning is not finite. Any cluster of entities which cannot be considered random is a pattern. And, in mathematics, randomness itself is considered only a measure of man’s ignorance. So, within what is considered random, many “patterns” may yet be discovered. And, of course, music also has use for obviously random “patterns”. So, the pattern recognition/creation issue is far more complicated than it seems.
Patterning belongs to the territory of “ideation” – abstract thinking -- which maestros often develop through a study of abstract subjects like aesthetics, philosophy, psychology, mathematics, metaphysics, and even occult sciences like astrology. The personalized mode of art transmission in Hindustani music adopted the model of mystical apprenticeship, and is known to have encompassed such initiation. Should the pedagogy of institutional art transmission concern itself with this resource of extra-musical ideation? The proposition is worth considering.
The communicative dimension
The communicative dimension of classical music relates to the ability of a musician to execute and deliver musical ideas to his/her listeners. This has two facets. The first is technical command over his instrument/ voice. The second is a command over the architecture of the genre in which he/she performs. Casting the Raga (a Formless Form) into Communicable Form requires the agency of an established genre, each with its distinctive interaction between melody, rhythm, and poetry (where relevant), and movements sequenced “logically” for cumulative absorption, retention and response. Prof. Ashok Ranade referred to this process as one of “Ritualisation”.
This dimension of classical music is “mechanical” and structural, and possibly the easiest to teach – whether in the personalized model of art-transmission or in the University system. It can be imparted through riyaz routines, and even memorization.
A command over the communicative dimension is, of course, crucial because a musician experiences two kinds of anxiety in performance – execution anxiety and ideation anxiety. A mastery over the communicative dimension relieves the musician of the execution anxiety during performance, and frees his musical energies for attending to the ideational content of the music. But, the communicative dimension – no matter how highly developed – has little musical value unless supported by the flowering of musicianship. This flowering relies predominantly on the remaining two dimensions – the expressive and meditative.
The expressive dimension
The expressive dimension in music produces a manner of manifesting the character, quality of feelings, sentiments or intentions of the musician. Expression is primarily a manifestation of the musician’s sense of self-hood, and an awareness of himself as the generator of aesthetic value. It is this dimension which Prof. Ranade once described as “Individuation”.
As a pedagogical issue, this is perhaps the toughest challenge. How do you generate/ inculcate/ activate the sense of self-hood in a musician? Guru-s in the personalized model perhaps did not see this as a significant issue at all. Enlightened present-day Guru-s have, however, often struggled with this issue for decades even with their most talented students.
Eminent Guru-s, with whom I have discussed this issue have expressed two views: Some believe that such a flowering of the musical personality usually begins between the ages of 40 and 45. Others believe that a growing involvement in the Raga-ness results in the musician building a special relationship with Raga-s, and this relationship causes an “Individuation” to surface in its rendition.
These two views could well be saying the same thing. Amercian composer, WA Mathieu, well versed in Hindustani music, articulates this memorably in his work “A musical life”. We often speak of a musical performance as a “piece”. What is it a “piece” of? It is, indeed, a piece of life itself. Feeling and expressing a Raga in an individualistic manner could well require the musician to have started understanding life -- a possibility that crystallizes only after 40.
Does this dimension of musicianship deserve pedagogical attention? Is there a way of speeding up the evolution of a musician’s special relationship with the Raga-ness ahead of his/her emotional maturity as a person? Or is the whole dimension of expression to be left to the natural processes of personality development?
With a musician’s involvement in Raga-ness being a factor, we are approaching the meditative/ contemplative dimension of Hindustani music.
The meditative dimension
The meditative dimension of Hindustani music – the element of “Ideation” -- is fundamental because the Hindustani musician combines in himself the role of the composer and performer, both roles working simultaneously during performance. Performance is nothing but the rendering/ translating/ interpreting the Formless Form of the Raga in communicable form. Being formless, the Raga is pregnant with a virtually infinite number of aesthetically coherent melodic ideas. This is why we need to recognize three levels of access to the Raga form.
1. Gurumukhi Swaroop: This is the Raga-form that a musician imbibes from his Guru/ Guru-s/ Teachers.
2. Sarvamanya Swaroop: The consensual melodic personality of the Raga, as has been explored by all musicians whose music is available – an aggregate of all the melodic ideas hitherto explored -- and which listeners recognize as belonging to a Raga.
3. Virata Swaroop: This represents all the melodic possibilities of the Formless Form of the Raga – including those yet remaining unexplored. This notion of Raga-Swaroop is limited only by the boundaries between the specific Raga and other Raga-s.
Our tradition expects that every musician will aim at penetrating/ transcending the Sarvamanya Swaroop and access the Virata Swaroop for newer insights into the melodic and emotional possibilities latent in the Raga. But, how can he penetrate the Sarvmanya sawroopa without having first mastered it?
This is a serious pedagogical issue for institutionalized education which, I suspect, remains, largely neglected. Even in my interactions with serious young musicians, I have found the greatest lethargy on this count. A Raga belongs to nobody. Every musician participates in its evolution.The musical culture has not been able to come to terms with the reality that a serious study of the tradition is a rent every generation has to pay in order to occupy a place in the tradition. It is clearly absurd to assume or believe that anyone can be an original interpreter of a Raga without having taken the trouble of absorbing every facet of it that has already been explored.
The key to excellence
This brings me to the argument I suggested in the earlier part of my observations . Hindustani music cannot produce either a great musician or a significant musicologist without a vast exposure to performed/ recorded music. No Guru, no University, no books can cultivate his musical/ critical abilities to a level of excellence without extensive and intensive listening. And, fortunately for today's aspirants, never before in history has a 100 years of music been available for study, thus permitting a panoramic as well as encyclopedic understanding of the tradition.
In such exposure, the aspiring musician/ scholar has access to all the three dimensions of Hindustani music. The communicative. The expressive. The meditative. He will absorb the insights according to his innate endowments of musicality. His insights will grow at a pace permitted by his intellect, memory, and his exposure to the world beyond music. His individuality will grow as he evolves his“Personal Musical Statement”with the help of all the inputs he has absorbed. There is a pedagogical perspective here. But, that is possibly less important than my basic argument.
A life in classical music is a self-driven journey. There is a space in it for mentors, inspirations, and even guides. If one tries to quantify the size of this space, one may produce numbers that are culturally repugnant. But, the truth is that no Guru, and no University, can entirely claim the shaping of either an eminent musician or an eminent musicologist.
If a great musician has spent a total of 10,000 hours receiving taleem from his Guru, he has almost certainly spent 20,000 hours of life listening to other musicians of stature. If a significant scholar of music has spent 5000 hours pursuing degrees in music, I am certain that he has spent 10,000 hours studying works unrelated to the syllabus. And, those who match a yardstick of excellence in either department can be expected to have had intensive exposure to other department as much as their own pursuit.
Classical music is a philosophical art. Involvement with it arises from a thirst for unraveling a mysterious territory of human experience. It can be compared, in some ways, to the spiritual urge with which the more evolved souls are born. Those born to this calling will quench their thirst, with or without any guidance.
(c) Deepak S. Raja .March, 2018
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Thursday, February 1, 2018
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Monday, October 2, 2017
"The Surbahar's future? Andhakarmoy" অন্ধকারময় says Smt. Annapoorna Devi
Question:
Did Alauddin Khansaheb play the Surbahar? If so who were his teachers?
Question:
It is known that Ayat Ali Khansaheb was a Surbahar player. Who were his
teachers?
Answer:
Baba took Ustad Ayat Ali Khansaheb (his brother) to my Dadaguru Ustad Wazir
Khansaheb, Rampur. Ustad Wazir
Khansaheb then taught surbahar to Ustad
Ayat Ali Khansaheb.
Question:
Did you study the instrument with Baba or Ayet Alai Khansaheb, or both?
Answer:
I studied under Baba.
Question:
Have you trained any students on the Surbahar? Can I have the names, please?
Answer:
Niloufer (Ustad Rais Khan’s sister) did learn from me for some time.
Question:
Would you care to name some of the good Surbahar players she has heard in your times? What was their background? Whose students
were they?
Answer: I hardly went out. Didn’t hear any
surbahar players.
Question:
Were you taught the 3-mizrab, 2 mizrab, or single mizrab Baj of the Surbahar?
With how many mizrabs did you perform? Did you use the little finger for the
Chikari, as on the Been?
Answer:
I have performed wearing two mizrabs as
well as single mizrab. Yes. I use the fingernail of the little finger for the chikari.
Question:
In your gharana, has Surbahar been played only for alap-jod-jhala? Or were
Dhrupad-Dhamar or Masitkhani bandishes also played on the instrument?
Answer: In our Gharana surbahar is for
alap-jod-jhala -- although occasionally we do play tar paran and Dhrupad
compositions.
Question:
Is it right to say that the Surbahar uses only Da (inward) strokes on the Baj
string? Or, are Ra (outward) strokes also used?
Answer:
Yes. As a rule, this is the Surbahar technique. However, when not
playing pure Dhrupad anga, the Ra stroke are used for playing fast passages in some
ragas.
Question:
Is it right to say that the Surbahar melodic idiom is predominantly a
"meend" idiom, with virtually no role for fretwork techniques? My
experience tells me that Surbahar notes sound lifeless on the frets.
Answer: True.
Question:
What is the correct/ most common thickness of the Baj string on the Surbahar?
Niloufer had told me Rais Khan and she used No. 6. Vilayat Khansaheb, and Imrat
Khansaheb use No. 5. What gauge did you use in youth? Is it decided by the acoustic design of
the particular instrument?
Answer:
I think it is a question of preference.
Some sitar players use no. 3 while some use no 4. For surbahar some people feel comfortable
with no. 6. I use no. 5. I do not know much about the acoustic
design but I think the person who does
the jawari needs to do it a bit differently for different gauges.
Question:
At what pitch are most Surbahars tuned for solo performance?
Answer: I tune my Saa to the tivra madhyam of the sitar
Question:
The Surbahar has survived as long as Siatrsists were willing to master two
different instruments. Can you give me your views on the future of the Surbahar?
Answer:
Andhakarmoy!
(c) Deepak S. Raja 2009
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Tuesday, August 15, 2017
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Book Review: Biography of Smt. Gangubai Hangal by Deepa Ganesh
Subtitle:
The musical journey of Gangubai Hangal
Author:
Deepa Ganesh
Publisher:
Three Essays Collective, Gurgaon,
First edition: 2014
First edition: 2014
Pages:
220.
Price: Hard Cover: Rs. 600
Price: Hard Cover: Rs. 600
This
biographical work on the towering Hindustani vocalist, Gangubai Hangal
(1913-2009), is based on a series of visits the author made to the diva’s home,
and extensive interviews with people close to her subject. The author’s
discovery of this extraordinary personality spans a period of 4 years
(2005-2009).
The book traces
the emergence of Northern Karnataka as a powerhouse of Hindustani classical
music during the colonial period. Substantial credit for it goes to the Wodeyar
princes of Mysore, who were patrons to the finest musicians of the Carnatic and
Hindustani traditions alike. Hubli, Dharwad and Belgaum were natural stop-overs
for Hindustani musicians travelling between their homes and the Mysore Court. This
led to an exchange of musical ideas between Hindustani and Carnatic musicians
of the region.
From the late 19th
century, the bi-lingual region, (Kannada + Marathi) enthusiastically patronized
Marathi theater, which featured some of the finest Hindustani musicians of the
era. From the dawn of the 20th century, the gramophone record made the
finest Hindustani musicians – from within and outside regional theater – household
names in Northern Karnataka. Simultaneously, the missionary work of Bhatkhande
and Vishnu Digambar – both from Maharashtra -- had begun to democratize the
musical culture. The prestige of
Hindustani music shot up immensely in the region, as religious leaders attached
to the Lingayat monasteries became proficient in Hindustani music, and started
imparting training to young aspirants. This
configuration of forces enabled the emergence of Gangubai as a significant
musical persona.
The Kirana
gharana founder, Abdul Kareem Khan, visited Hubli often, became an admirer of
Gangubai’s mother, Ambabai, a Carnatic musician, and allowed his own music to
be influenced by her musicianship. Young Gangubai was taught Carnatic music at
home, but succumbed to the attraction of Hindustani music, which played from
the gramophones of every neighborhood tea stall. After an aborted apprenticeship with
Krishnamacharya, a local Hindustani vocalist, Gangubai ended up as a disciple
of Rambhau Kundgolkar (Sawai Gandharva) from nearby Kundgol, the foremost disciple
of the Kirana gharana founder, Abdul Kareem Khan.
The book deals adequately
with Gangubai’s family and social circumstance. Her mother, Ambabai, was a
Carnatic vocalist nurtured in the Devadasi tradition. She was greatly respected
for her musicianship, but ostracized socially for her lower-caste birth and her
profession. According to the Devadasi tradition, Ambabai became the subordinate
(non co-habiting) wife of an upper-caste landlord, and headed a matriarchal
family, dependent on her earnings as a musician. For Gangubai, her father,
Chikurao Nadiger, represented an occasional and irrelevant presence during her
mother’s lifetime. Ambabai died while Gangubai was still in her teens.
Gangubai became the breadwinner of the family,
which included her two maternal uncles, and their growing families. Her uncles’
contribution to the household expenses was unstable. At its peak, her family of
dependents numbered 20. Gangubai herself accepted the role of a subordinate
wife to Gururaj Kaulgi, a Brahmin widower, who gave Gangubai three children and
a host of financial problems arising from his incompetence as a breadwinner. For
Gangubai, starvation was the only alternative to success as a musician. The
greatness came because the survival anxiety never left her.
Deepa Ganesh’
work details painstakingly the role of her maternal uncle, Ramanna, in
preparing Gangubai for her career in music with a fatherly presence,
substantially replacing her mother, Ambabai as the anchor of her life. Ramanna
used the good offices of a family friend, Dattopant Desai, to place Gangubai
under the apprenticeship of Rambhau Kundgolkar, and acted as her protector and
companion on her daily trips from Hubli to Kundgol for her tuitions. Rambhau
was the principal disciple of Abdul Kareem Khan, who had enriched his musical
vision by studying with several other maestros from other lineages.
As a
result, he had carved out an illustrious career as a singer-actor in regional
theater. After his withdrawal from the nomadic life of the theater, he became
available as a Guru. Because of Gangubai’s devotion to him, and fastidious
compliance with his teaching, she soon became his favorite disciple. He kept a
hawk’s eye on her commercial recordings, and radio broadcasts for compliance
with his training. Her musicianship flowered under his demanding care. The bond
of devotion between the Guru and disciple was such that Gangubai brought
Rambhau to her own home along with his wife and cared for him for three years
after his paralytic stroke. In return, even during his last days, even as he
was sinking, Rambhau insisted on teaching Gangubai newer Raga-s and
compositions.
Gangubai’s
professional career was virtually launched in the electronic media. By the
1930s, the radio and the gramophone record were fast growing in reach and
popularity, and were hungry for talent. On these platforms, starting in 1936, Gangubai
was able to build a national reputation as a formidable musician. Soon after
her professional debut, she had a serious problem with her throat. The surgery
deprived her voice of its feminity and agility. She was left with a masculine
voice of limited maneuverability and range. (The title of the book, in this
context, is ironic) What ensued was an intense struggle to re-invent her
repertoire and her approach to music. She transformed this setback into a
unique musical asset, and continued to acquire a following.
She enjoyed
immense stature on the concert circuit between 1950 and 1970, but continued to
perform ,as her vitality levels would permit, until a few years before the end
came. The shower of recognition and awards had begun as early as 1948, and grew
into a torrent. This included honorary Doctorates from several Universities,
the fellowships of performing arts academies, nominations to houses of state
and central legislatures, and the Padma awards. As her performing career waned,
Gangubai, a well-informed and well-read lady, allowed herself to evolve into a
public personality, heard with respect on social issues for her wisdom and
simplicity of demeanor.
Besides her
uncle and her Guru, the two anchors of her life after her mother’s demise, the
book deals appropriately with some other special relationships Gangubai
developed during her life. During her
apprenticeship with Rambhau, she developed a warm fraternal relationship with
Bhimsen Joshi, a few years her junior. Two of her seniors in the profession,
Kesarbai Kerkar, and Hirabai Barodekar, developed great affection for Gangubai,
and furthered he career. Mallikarjun Mansoor, a childhood friend, remained a
close friend of her family throughout.
As her career blossomed, she developed a
personal friendship with Mrs. Sushila Ambike, and Professor of Sanskrit in
Delhi University, and earned the admiration of Mr. HY Sharda Prasad, the media
advisor to Mrs. Indira Gandhi. The famous Kannada poet, DR Bendre, who was once
her teacher in school, became her close friend and admirer, giving her access
to a presence in the social and political life of Northern Karnataka.
The author
presents an elaborate picture of Gangubai’s rootedness to her native Dharwad,
to her responsibilities as the head of her household, to her family and to the
kitchen as the object of her lifelong struggle for economic security and the
vehicle for her hospitality. (Appropriately, the book even ends with two of her
favourite recipes). Gangubai accepted all the financial strains of her domestic
responsibilities, and denied herself comforts
and luxuries of all kinds in order to fulfil them. Her only relationship that
the author rightly places under a microscope is the one with her daughter
Krishna.
Krishna was
Gangubai’s first child, born to her when she was only 16. She was never
formally trained in music. But, she had a melodious and agile voice, an exceptional
musical mind, and a natural flair. In addition, she was an extremely
well-organised person. Krishna speedily became Gangubai’s concert planner, and
manager. Her musical role began as an accompanist, but grew into that of a
partner, and as Gangubai’s vitality levels diminished, ended finally as lead
singer. Gangubai evidently found it convenient to deny Krishna her own life,
and found arguments to justify her convenience. Krishna’s marriage was never
considered on the grounds that her constitution was too weak for child-bearing.
Independent concert engagements for Krishna were blocked because her solo
concerts would bring in a much lower fee than a joint concert. The author believes that Gangubai feared the
loneliness that would ensue Krishna’s independence. But, as luck would have it,
Krishna succumbed to cancer in her 74th year, leaving Gangubai, then
90, to face a lonely end.
The author recognizes
that Gangubai’s extra-musical persona is
more firmly etched in the public mind than her musicianship. There is some
merit in the author’s suggestion that Gangubai herself may have shaped this
phenomenon by allowing her humble beginnings and her struggles to dominate
public attention. The purpose of so doing
-- though perhaps unconscious – would have been to highlight the
magnitude of her accomplishments.
The result was that while her formidable musicianship is acknowledged, its distinctiveness has remained largely undocumented. All that is remembered of her music is her androgynous voice, austere musical vision, soulful delivery, deploying a deliberate, unhurried approach to performance. The author attempts to partly enlarge the assessment of her musicality by comparing it to that of her leading contemporaries, especially those of the Kirana tradition. This reviewer believes that this task remains yet to be done satisfactorily, and deserves a survey of several senior musicians who had heard Gangubai in her prime.
The result was that while her formidable musicianship is acknowledged, its distinctiveness has remained largely undocumented. All that is remembered of her music is her androgynous voice, austere musical vision, soulful delivery, deploying a deliberate, unhurried approach to performance. The author attempts to partly enlarge the assessment of her musicality by comparing it to that of her leading contemporaries, especially those of the Kirana tradition. This reviewer believes that this task remains yet to be done satisfactorily, and deserves a survey of several senior musicians who had heard Gangubai in her prime.
The details this
work provides on Gangubai’s social and economic circumstance, and her grooming under Rambhau Kundgolkar,
have been familiar for long to serious music lovers, especially of the 60+
generation. The author has done well to present these in broad brush strokes
rather than the excruciating detail that has appeared earlier elsewhere. What
makes this work a comprehensive word picture of a towering personality is the
author’s exploration of her life beyond the known. The essential tenor of this biographocal work – and perhaps also its inspiration -- is adulatory, though the author’s
scrutiny of Gangubai’s relationship with Krishna is objective enough to avert
the charge of gaga journalism.
The work does occasionally drift towards
journalistic “editorializing”, with a stance akin to that of a social
scientist. This may irk experienced readers of biographical literature. The
book also reveals a feminist streak, which appears contextually unwarranted,
except for the incidental reality that this is a woman writer’s work on a lady
musician.
The book exposes
some lapses at the Editorial Desk. For instance, Gangubai’s son is mentioned
variously as “Babu” and “Babanna”. Her daughter-in-law is referred to variously
as “Lalitha” and “Lalithakka”. Likewise, Ustad Abdul Kareem Khan is referred to
as “Abdul Kareem Khan”, “Kareem Khan”, and “Abdul Kareem Khan Saab”. The
standardization of nomenclatures would have greatly helped readers unfamiliar
with culture-specific variations. While Kannada words mostly carry translations
in parentheses, there are several cases of usage unaccompanied by translations.
The occasional recourse to musicologically sensitive words may make the serious
reader wince. He will, for instance, wonder what the terms “purity of a note”
or the “purity of music” are intended to connote. The larger issue is whether the lay reader
will understand any better. The connotation of such phrases is seldom made
transparent by the context in which they are used.
The
author’s purpose was to “rediscover a woman who occupied a niche in musical
folklore”. The author admits to the
limitations of her enquiry arising from the advanced age of her subject and
fragility of her recall. Nevertheless, the author’s purpose stands largely
fulfilled. The book is a welcome addition to the reservoir of biographical
literature on towering 20th century musicians. Its timing ensures
that it will attract a readership of young music lovers who may know Gangubai
through her recordings, but remember her either as everybody’s idea of a
Grandmother, or as the Grand Old Lady of Northern Karnataka.
Reviewer: Deepak Raja
Review published in THE BOOK REVIEW
Review published in THE BOOK REVIEW
Monday, July 17, 2017
Monday, February 20, 2017
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Sunday, January 29, 2017
Saturday, January 28, 2017
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Sunday, April 17, 2016
Book Review: The Raga-ness of Raga-s. The Statesman, Kolkata, April 16, 2016
Author presenting the book to Pt. Arvind Parikh |
The book begins with “Perspectives on Raga-ness” by explaining and analysing the concept called raga and its relation with rasas; and then moves on to explore and identify the essence of a raga in a) bandishes: that showcase the features of a raga from several angles; b) alap: which elaborates the raga at slow pace; c) taan: which follows raga movements at fast pace that “emphasise the sameness of all ragas”; and, above all, d) the raga-ness of the musician who performs and composes at once.
Raja admits that since “Hindustani music grants the musician the simultaneous roles of performer and composer”, this creative licence has helped in the evolution of ragas. According to him, the raga is “a melodic structure, tight enough to remain distinct and identifiable and yet loose enough to form the basis for considerable improvisational freedom”. Under the circumstances, “Ragas can, and do change even over time.”
The second part of the book, “The world of the Raga”, contains the analysis of 49 ragas replete with their ascending-descending orders, catch phrases, parental scale, sister ragas, etc, along with their historical evolution and opinions of several legendary musicians and musicologists. The book is further enriched by a foreword penned by eminent vocalist Vidushi Ashwini Bhide, an introduction by Lyle Wachovsky, a guest essay on the concept of “Rasa and Western System of Keys” by Alessandro Dozio and a glossary of terms — nicely explained. The most admirable qualities of the book are the author’s lucid pen, at times dipped in humour. Interesting anecdotes have spiced up the book that opens new vistas of melodic analysis.
Reviewer: Meena Banerjee
Reviewer: Meena Banerjee
Book Review: The Raga-ness of Raga-s. The Hindu, April 15, 2016.
FRIDAY REVIEW: April 15, 2016
Musicologist Deepak S. Raja explores “the Raga-ness of Ragas” in his latest book.
It is a fact that as compared to the art of music, its philosophy is a dry subject. Even highly educated practicing
Author with Ustad Shujaat Khan |
But exceptions are there who straddle both music and musicology with delighting clarity. My Guru Pandit Amarnath, inspired by the analytical aptitude of his legendary ustad, Amir Khan Sahib, never accepted anything without weighing its values. This, according to him, would give additional thrill and confidence as what-s and why-s always enrich the how-s. He would often tell us to think beyond the clichéd Ranjayate iti ragah and explore the tattwa (matter) that resides behind the façade of a given raga, that makes it a living thing, that dies with the end of a concert to be reborn in another – and in a new avatar!
All those cherished memories dawned upon me gleaming with new discernments when I read “The Raga-ness of Ragas” authored by well-known musicologist Deepak S Raja. The title of the book has the tagline “Ragas beyond the Grammar”. It was obvious that the book’s domain is empirical – beyond the tangible periphery of mere academics. It had to be; because those who know Deepak Raja, are aware that he is a sitar and surbahar exponent (Etawah Gharana) and learnt khayal (Jaipur-Atrauli Gharana) apart from studying musicology under the guidance of eminent scholars. He is a repertoire analyst for India Archive Music Ltd., New York and writes extensively about his experiences as a musician-cum-researcher. Far away from the scholastic dryness, his works (this one is his fourth book in a row) are steeped in tried-and-tested melodic recipes.
The author admits that since “Hindustani music grants the musician the simultaneous roles of performer and composer” this creative license has helped in the evolution of ragas. The raga is “a melodic structure, tight enough to remain distinct and identifiable and yet loose enough to form the basis for considerable improvisational freedom.” He reiterates a well-known fact that “Ragas can, and do, change even over time.” Under the circumstances, standardisation of ragas’ features becomes necessary. But being a sensitive musician himself, the author did not try to shackle the beautiful body of the raga; instead he approaches the core of its heart from a totally different angle of a mystic.
Divided into two parts this book begins with ‘Perspectives on Raga-ness’ by explaining and analysing the concept called raga and its relation with rasas; and then moves on to explore and identify the essence of a raga in a) bandishes: that showcase the features of a raga from several angles; b) aalap: which elaborates the raga at slow pace; c) taan: which follows raga-movements at fast pace that ‘emphasise the sameness of all ragas’; and above all d) the raga-ness of the musician who performs and composes at once.
According to the author, musician’s own personality reflects through his art as he relates to his music according to his saatwik (pristine pure), raajasik (passionate) or taamasik (impure) mindset. Saatwik chooses to treat the raga as the Almighty. Raajasik follows the commonly accepted form of raga to win mass approval. Taamasik remains oblivious to raga’s soul; only entertainment becomes his goal to earn money. Any one or all can influence an artiste’s psyche.
To add to the melodic content in the real ‘practical’ sense, the second part of the book, ‘The world of the Raga’, contains the analysis of 49 ragas replete with their ascending-descending orders, catch phrases, parental scale, sister ragas etc. along with their historical evolution and opinions of several legendary musicians and musicologists.
The book is further enriched by eminent vocalist Vidushi Ashwini Bhide’s soul-searching foreword, an introduction by Lyle Wachovsky, a guest essay on the concept of ‘Rasa and Western System of Keys’ by Alessandro Dozio and a glossary of explicated terms. The most admirable qualities of the book are the author’s lucid pen, at times, dipped in humour, and an eye for apt melodious anecdotes. It opens new vistas of melodic views, no doubt.
Reviewer: Meena Banerjee
Monday, April 11, 2016
Book Review: The Raga-ness of Raga-s. by Shuchita Rao
Title: The Raga-ness of Ragas
Author: Deepak S. Raja
Hardcover 366+ pages,
ISBN 978-81-246-0835-7
Published in India, 2016 by D.K Printworld
Available on Amazon.com Price: $62.50
Author: Deepak S. Raja
Hardcover 366+ pages,
ISBN 978-81-246-0835-7
Published in India, 2016 by D.K Printworld
Available on Amazon.com Price: $62.50
Growing up in India and learning about “ragas” from master musicians, I learned how to sing several ragas with ease. I never felt the need to explain the concept of a raga (a key melodic concept in Indian classical music) to anyone. Every listener was already familiar with it. After moving to the United States, I found my listeners asking for an explanation for the term “raga” even before listening to it. “What is a raga?” they asked.
For decades (if not centuries), the exercise of defining the term “raga” has challenged academicians, teachers and practicing musicians alike. The noted Indian musicologist and author Deepak Raja started out on a journey several years ago with the mission to explore the subject of what constitutes the essence of ragas (what the author terms as “raga-ness”) and to articulate it to the best possible extent through the medium of language. His reflections on this topic have taken the form of a book titled “The Raga-ness of Ragas” published in early 2016.
In this beautifully bound hardcover book, the author Deepak Raja examines the concept of a raga and its raga-ness from the points of view of their melodic and aesthetic grammar. The author’s personal observations on Hindustani music, quoted excerpts from ancient classic treatises as well as contemporary books on Indian music and the scholarly perspectives of practicing musicians make the book an interesting read. By relating funny stories and anecdotes, the author manages to infuse liveliness in what could otherwise be a dry and theoretical study.
The book is divided into two parts. The first part contains eleven comprehensive essays on the foundational concept of the raga, and how the essence of a raga can be established through the proper and effective use of elements such as bandish (composition), alaap (slow, meditative movement that unfolds the raga), taans (faster melodic movements performed during the rendition of the raga) as well as special techniques used by vocalists and instrumentalists. In his capacity as a repertoire analyst for India Archive Music Ltd based in New York, the author analyzed over one hundred ragas performed by 50 prominent musicians. A survey of 49 of these 100 ragas are presented in the second part of the book.
A brilliant foreword by the eminent Hindustani vocalist and composer, Dr. Ashwini Bhide Deshpande, a succinct introductory chapter by Lyle Wachovsky of New York based India Archive Music Ltd, an illuminating guest essay on the concept of “Rasa and Western System of Keys” by Alessandro Dozio, a detailed glossary of terms and explanatory notes as well as a comprehensive bibliography are great additions to the book.
The opening chapter of the first part of the book introduces the concept of a raga as a specialist vehicle in communicating emotional ideas. In the remaining ten chapters of Part I of the book, the fact that the raga takes on a new shape each time it is performed, the examination of the socio-economic context in which music practice evolved up until the 19th century, the consideration of ragas in terms of chemical metaphors such as allotropes, compounds and emulsions, a discussion about suitable performance times for ragas unique to the Hindustani system of music, the evaluation of the theory of Rasa in Hindustani music and the exploration of the concept of raga-ness manifested in the melodic elements of bandish, alaap and taans are discussed at length.
The second part of the book is an analysis of 49 ragas in terms of attributes such as melodic ascents, descents, parent family, musical notes of importance and the critical skeletal phraseology that establishes the center of melodic gravity for each of the ragas. The author looks at the evolution of these ragas from a historical perspective and quotes the opinions of several well known scholars such as Bhatkhande, Manikbuwa Thakurdas, Peter Manuel, vocalists such as Faiyyaz Ahmed Khan and instrumentalists such as sitarist Ustad Vilayat Khan.
“I feel that raga-tattva or raga-ness of ragas is the most important facet of our musical culture requiring comprehension and preservation” said Deepak Raja to this book reviewer. Deepak Raja has authored two other books on Hindustani music titled “Khayal Vocalism” and “Hindustani Music Today”. His blog on ragas http://www.swaratala.blogspot.com commands a dedicated following from Hindustani classical music lovers.
Deepak Raja’s fine analytical and writing skills as well as the application of his knowledge from a wide variety of disciplines such as art, history, culture, linguistics, mathematics, physics, chemistry, economics and psychology to the study of Hindustani music are praise-worthy. His reputation for serious research in Hindustani music, critical thinking skills, sound analytical approach and brilliant articulation shine through this book. “The Raga-ness of Ragas” is one of the most enjoyable books on raga music that I have read in the recent times.
Reviewer: Shuchita Rao in Lokvani E-Paper
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)